<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Mongrel Dogs Who Teach &#187; primary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/tag/primary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel</link>
	<description>Thoughts on teaching, politics, life in general</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Finally, an unvarnished truth from Senator Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/finally-an-unvarnished-truth-from-senator-clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/finally-an-unvarnished-truth-from-senator-clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mongreldogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unintended irony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/22/finally-an-unvarnished-truth-from-senator-clinton/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/finally-an-unvarnished-truth-from-senator-clinton/' addthis:title='Finally, an unvarnished truth from Senator Clinton' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div>In the Jan 21 debate, on the subject of national security, Senator Clinton said, And if it is indeed the classic Republican campaign, I’ve been there. I’ve done that. See? She&#8217;s confessing that she and Bill really do steal plays &#8230; <a href="http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/finally-an-unvarnished-truth-from-senator-clinton/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/finally-an-unvarnished-truth-from-senator-clinton/' addthis:title='Finally, an unvarnished truth from Senator Clinton' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/finally-an-unvarnished-truth-from-senator-clinton/' addthis:title='Finally, an unvarnished truth from Senator Clinton' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div><p>In the Jan 21 debate, on the subject of national security, Senator Clinton said,</p>
<blockquote><p>
And if it is indeed the classic Republican campaign, I’ve been there. I’ve done that.
</p></blockquote>
<p>See?  She&#8217;s confessing that she and Bill really <em>do</em> steal plays from the Karl Rove playbook&#8230; she&#8217;s &#8220;done&#8221; a Republican campaign.</p>
<p>Wait, wait.  You say that that&#8217;s not what she meant, that &#8220;clearly&#8221; she was commenting on the kind of campaigns she&#8217;s faced, not endorsing those tactics?  I don&#8217;t know, it sounds a lot like parsing it to have it both ways&#8230;</p>
<p>(Obviously, I hope, I&#8217;m trying to draw a comparison to the freak-out that occurred when Sen. Obama noted the historical fact that Ronald Reagan was good at motivating people to vote Republican.  Somehow his clear-as-day remark transmogrified into worship at the altar of Reagan.  But Clinton&#8217;s comment &#8212; that her nomination would put us through the same Republican assaults we&#8217;ve suffered since, well, 1992 &#8212; apparently that&#8217;s not worthy of note.)</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/finally-an-unvarnished-truth-from-senator-clinton/' addthis:title='Finally, an unvarnished truth from Senator Clinton' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/finally-an-unvarnished-truth-from-senator-clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton&#8217;s New Hampshire victory: What does it mean?</title>
		<link>http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/clintons-new-hampshire-victory-what-does-it-mean/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/clintons-new-hampshire-victory-what-does-it-mean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mongreldogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/09/clintons-new-hampshire-victory-what-does-it-mean/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/clintons-new-hampshire-victory-what-does-it-mean/' addthis:title='Clinton&#8217;s New Hampshire victory: What does it mean?' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div>Shirt answer: A whole lot less than the punditocracy would like you to believe. Long answer: Oh, my goodness, people. Could we all just stop with the wild oscillations from day to day? No one in their right mind believed &#8230; <a href="http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/clintons-new-hampshire-victory-what-does-it-mean/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/clintons-new-hampshire-victory-what-does-it-mean/' addthis:title='Clinton&#8217;s New Hampshire victory: What does it mean?' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/clintons-new-hampshire-victory-what-does-it-mean/' addthis:title='Clinton&#8217;s New Hampshire victory: What does it mean?' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div><p>Shirt answer:  A whole lot less than the punditocracy would like you to believe.</p>
<p>Long answer: Oh, my goodness, people.  Could we all just stop with the wild oscillations from day to day?  No one in their right mind believed the polls showing Obama up by double digits in a single week.  Clinton didn&#8217;t score a &#8220;comeback&#8221; because she didn&#8217;t go away:  She has been strong in NH for the past year.  Until a couple of weeks ago, Clinton had a 20 point edge on Obama and yet she won the state by only 2 points.  How is that a comeback?</p>
<p>But what about all those polls showing the &#8220;Obama bounce&#8221;?  They were ludicrous to believe.  It takes time for actual views to shift, but polls are sensitive to short-period trends and, especially, news coverage.  All of a sudden, after winning Iowoa, Obama was everywhere on the news.  Of course his numbers ticked up.</p>
<p>Did Clinton &#8220;save&#8221; her candidacy by shedding a tear or by performing well at the debate or by saber-rattling?  No, she &#8220;saved&#8221; it by having a strong organization in a friendly state.  For five days, her supporters have been yelling at us that no one should count her out &#8212; correctly.  But  after castigating everyone for misinterpreting Iowa, they are exultantly misinterpreting New Hampshire.  Excluding the post-Iowa media insanity, things turned out about as would be expected &#8212; indeed, I think Obama did better than anyone would have said just four weeks ago.   (I mourn that my guy Edwards did not stage the upset that would truly have <em>been</em> an upset.)</p>
<p>Anyone with technical experience knows you don&#8217;t trust the gauge until it&#8217;s had time to settle down.  Trying to spin Obama&#8217;s bounce into a steamroller mandate was silly.  Trying to spin Clinton&#8217;s just-barely-held victory in a state she&#8217;d expected to win handily into a comeback of epic proportions&#8230; well, that&#8217;s just mendacious.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/clintons-new-hampshire-victory-what-does-it-mean/' addthis:title='Clinton&#8217;s New Hampshire victory: What does it mean?' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/clintons-new-hampshire-victory-what-does-it-mean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Impact of Tears</title>
		<link>http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/the-impact-of-tears/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/the-impact-of-tears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mongreldogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tears]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/07/the-impact-of-tears/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/the-impact-of-tears/' addthis:title='The Impact of Tears' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div>OK, so today during a campaign stop Hilary Clinton apparently teared up and allowed emotion into her voice. (See here for more if you need to.) And then John Edwards replied , &#8220;I think what we need in a commander-in-chief &#8230; <a href="http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/the-impact-of-tears/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/the-impact-of-tears/' addthis:title='The Impact of Tears' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/the-impact-of-tears/' addthis:title='The Impact of Tears' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div><p>OK, so today during a campaign stop Hilary Clinton apparently teared up and allowed emotion into her voice.  (See <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2008/01/in_emotional_moment_hillary_tears_up_up_on_campaign_trail.php">here </a>for more if you need to.)  And then John Edwards <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/rival-reacts-to.html">replied </a>, &#8220;I think what we need in a commander-in-chief is strength and resolve, and presidential campaigns are tough business, but being president of the United States is also tough business&#8221;.  Now the blogosphere is abuzz with how unfair this has been to Senator Clinton and how if anyone else shows emotion, it&#8217;s depth but for her, it&#8217;s a breakdown and why is Edwards so <em>mean</em>? and&#8230;</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t think Clinton&#8217;s teary moment is a big deal.  It&#8217;s been a long campaign, it hasn&#8217;t gone her way lately, and, win or lose, this is the capstone of her career.  I think it&#8217;s entirely forgivable if she has a vulnerable moment and allows some of that to leak through.  Here&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t get:  Edwards has been campaigning just as long and just as hard.  It&#8217;s pretty much the last act of his career, too.  He&#8217;s seen Hilary crowned as the inevitable candidate and Barack as the &#8220;change&#8221; candidate, while the national press has ignored his message and focused on his haircut.  Why isn&#8217;t it conceivable that his comment <em>also</em> reflects exhaustion and snappishness rather than a deep flaw?</p>
<p>I admit, I&#8217;m an Edwards supporter.  But the reaction coverage seems genuinely out of line here.  She was weak for a moment and let slip some tears.  He was weak for a moment and snarked her.  It&#8217;s passed, now, people.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/the-impact-of-tears/' addthis:title='The Impact of Tears' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_email"></a><a class="addthis_button_stumbleupon"></a><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_menu"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/2008/01/the-impact-of-tears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

