Monthly Archives: July 2006

Signature Abuse

3 Replies

A lot of attention lately has been focused on “presidential signing statements” — declarations by the President as to how he intends to interpret the statutues he signs into law. Though the signing statement has existed for the history of the Republic, the current President has grotesquely expanded its use. In a report by the American Bar Association, it is noted that, from the founding of the Republic through the inauguration of President George Walker Bush, the signing statement had been used fewer than 600 times. In President Bush’s six years, he has issued over 800 such signing statements. Moreover, he has aggressively used these statements to stake out his political position, to override Congressional intent, and to establish himself as the only arbiter of the constitutionality of his actions.

What are the implications for the Republic?
Continue reading →

Academic Freedom versus Indoctrination?

2 Replies

A week or so ago (2006 July 23), the New York Times had an article (“Conspiracy Theories 101″ by Stanley Fish) detailing a brouhaha surrounding Kevin Barrett. Mr. Barrett is a lecturer at the University of Wisconsin who has gotten into hot water because he shared with his students his strong conviction that the World Trade Centers were destroyed not by Islamic terrorists but by the American government itself. Mr. Fish uses the occasion of Mr. Barrett’s controversy to expound the “correct” view of academic freedom, which Mr. Fish thinks both sides have gotten wrong in the Barrett debate. I think he misses the point.
Continue reading →

Another reason why US textbooks are so lousy…

Leave a reply

I saw an article in the New York Times (Schoolbooks Are Given F’s in Originality; 2006 July 13) that detailed a controversy broiling for some American history textbooks. It seems that, in describing the 9/11 attacks, the books A History of the United States and America: Pathways to the Present use virtually identical language. Apparently several other sets of passages dealing with recent history are also substantially the same.

However, the scandal is not what you think.

Continue reading →

Testing and Teaching Physics

Leave a reply

Lately I’ve been on a merciless campaign to reduce the paperwork clutter in my lab/office/classroom. Today I dove into the bottom drawer of a filing cabinet (because obviously, bottom drawer = hard to acess = most moldly junk.) and came across an envelope containing the qualifying exam I had to take when starting grad school at Stanford lo those many years ago. The very first piece of paper in the envelope was a cover letter from Dr. Bob Laughlin, who almost single-handedly crafted the qual.

In reading it over, I realized that — consciously or not — it epitomizes a number of common assumptions about testing in physics, or at least, in my teaching of physics. So for insights into the tortured past that made me the teacher I am :) read on.

Continue reading →

… If You Can Keep It

1 Reply

It’s a truism that’s become so trite it hardly rises to the level of a bumper sticker: Freedom isn’t free. You see it slapped across the back of SUVs, taped to the windows in Circle-K’s. Some days, it seems everyone can mouth the words but nobody understands them. Freedom isn’t free. It has always carried a cost, demanded a sacrifice. In any society that claims to be free, that liberty must be purchased.

Here I am not talking about, say, taxes. Taxes are not the price of liberty. I am not an anti-tax nut. I recognize, as Justice Holmes did, that “taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society”. Taxes pay for the police and the courts, the schools and the hospitals, for sanitation and water and roads. But that’s true for any civilization. Taxes make the modern American civilization possible. They do not make it free. One of the staggering lessons of history, quite unwelcome at the moment of triumph of global capitalism, is that the price of freedom is not set in dollars, or in yuan, or in barrels of petroleum, or in bullion.

The price of freedom is blood.

Continue reading →

Beyond the poundy drums

Leave a reply

BSG_S2I’m a fan of the new, “re-imagined” Battlestar Galactica on the Sci Fi channel. (Shamefaced confession: I am also a fan of the original schlocky BSG from 1978 — in fact I was one of those loudly decrying the new one as yet another unholy exploitation of the greats of my childhood. Oopsie.) I like the action, I like the characters, I like the surprising emotional depth. But one of the things that really makes the show for me is the soundtrack, arranged by Bear McCreary.

Continue reading →